[content]

Index A to ZApply NowFrom the ChancellorVisitorsAlumniPeople FinderFor the MediaFor Parentsjobs
Southern Illinois University Carbondale Home SIU Salukis
SalukinetSIUC IntranetAthleticsPublic Events CalendarWeather
Main
 HOME PAGE
 BUILD 3
 BUILD 4
 BUILD 5
STUDY GUIDES
 TUTORIALS
 USER GUIDES
 ONTOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION
DOWNLOADS
 FINGER PRINT DATABASE
 GFF FILES
 RELATED      PUBLICATIONS
INFORMATION
 NEW STORIES
 FIND US
 CONTACT US
LINKED SITES
 SOYBASE
  NCGR
 TIGR
 Feedback
SOYBEAN SEQUENCE
 BES
 EST
 GENOME SEQUENCE
 
Other Projects
Feedback
Data Submission

 

 
 

 

Round 1, SIU Soybean Genome


 
 

Methodology

This page documents Round 1 of converting soybean genomic data so that it can be displayed in GBrowse. Some 4,231 features were loaded into GBrowse: 3,367 Loci, 769 Clones, 75 Contigs, and 20 MLG's.

Distinguishing characteristics of Round 1:

A centimorgan-to-base conversion factor of 441,824.931130786 was used. An explanation as to how this was determined is in Step 1, Phase 2 A band-to-base conversion factor of 2,887.52588816 was used. An explanation as to how this was determined is in Step 3, Phase 1.

In some cases, the same marker was the anchor for two or more contigs. In these situations, the contigs were moved to be side-by-side.

The methodology of Round 1 follows below. To start at the beginning, read from the bottom up..

When the features were converted from the genetic map to the physical map, many of them inappropriately appeared to land in the same positions, which is impossible. Staggering their positions resulted in Step 5, which continued from the initial setup described further below.

(Note that in the process of staggering the loci, it was noticed that A724_3 and A510_2 each appeared on two different MLG's.)

Step 5 had two dead-end phases in its development. In Step 5, Phase 1, the locations were staggered in 1,000-base increments. This solved the problem of the loci overlapping, but clones and contigs still had inappropriate overlaps. Step 5, Phase 2 adjusted these increments to 100,000 bases. However, the clones and contigs would have to be readjusted and then the clones and loci readjusted. It was easier to stagger the contigs, first, intending to readjust the clones and loci. Step 5, Phase 3, did this. Step 5, Phase 4, adjusted the locations of the anchor clones which were associated with the contigs. Step 5, Phase 5, adjusted the locations of the anchor loci. Step 5, Phase 6, adjusted the locations of the corresponding non-anchor clones which only had linkages to one locus each. Step 5, Phase 7, manually adjusted the locations of six clones which had linkages to two loci each. (As a result, two other loci also had to be moved.) Remaining loci which were still stacked were staggered in Step 5, Phase 8. The corresponding clones were moved in Step 5, Phase 9.

The methodology of adjusting the features with conflicting locations follows..

The determinations of the initial locations of features resulted in an interesting loop: The contig locations depend upon the clone locations; but the clone locations depend upon the Loci locations; but the Loci locations depend upon the contig locations. Therefore the following initial plan was followed:

The initial plan:
  • Step 1: Load QTL's and Loci.
  • Step 2: Load clones based on the locations of the QTL's and Loci.
  • Step 3: Load contigs based on the locations of the clones.
  • Step 4: Adjust the locations of the markers based on their locations in the contigs.

The methodology of entering the initial soybean data into GBrowse follows. The more recent changes are at the top. To start from the beginning, read from the bottom up.


              Deepak
http://soybeangenome.siu.edu
Last update: July 31,2005.