Media & Communication
Resources·siucnews@siu.edu
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale Mailcode 6519
Carbondale, IL 62901
618/453-2276 phone·618/453-2230
fax
Sue Davis, Executive
Director
http://news.siu.edu
Headline
By K. C. Jaehnig
CARBONDALE, Ill. — When an evil, all-powerful Worm
ravages the countryside, a small band of adventurers sets
out to seek the Magic Sword that will undo the monster.While
it might sound like the plot for an epic film with great
special effects, it is in fact the essence of an ongoing
quest at Southern Illinois University Carbondale aimed at
defeating the soybean cyst nematode, the chief cause of
soybean crop loss across the Midwest and the world.
Supported by funds from the
United Soybean Board, SIUC biotechnologist David A.
Lightfoot and his research team — sometimes with scientists
from other universities, sometimes alone — have been looking
for the gene or genes that could make soybeans completely
resistant to SCN, as the nematode is commonly known. That
search has taken on new urgency in the face of what
Lightfoot calls the “Omega Strain” of SCN.
“It’s a biotype that can
attack and defeat all our resistance sources,” Lightfoot
said.
“Natural variation has
ceased to be able to deal with the worm. It’s as if when we
bred for resistance in soybean, we also bred for resistant
worms.”
It took roughly three years
for the researchers to search through the forest of soybean
DNA in which they thought the resistance gene or genes were
hiding, but in 1998, that effort plus what Lightfoot termed
“a lucky guess” struck gold.
“We found two genes— the
most important one and its partner, the major and the
minor,” he said.
The major, dubbed Rhg1, is
“absolutely necessary for resistance to every strain and
biotype of the worm — without it, you are completely
susceptible,” Lightfoot said.
“With it, you have the
potential to resist them all, if you have other genes
to go with it. It’s like the middle cog — it makes
resistance work.”
The minor, companion gene,
Rhg4, transmits information to the major gene, which then
acts on that information. Rhg4 also provides a certain
amount of resistance on its own.
“We can prove in
traditional ways that this one is a solid gene,” Lightfoot
said. “If we put it in a plant, it provides resistance. And
the good news is that we are in a position to change it to
make it even better.
“Rhg1 is more complicated —
there’s something strange about how it works. Resistance
genes should be dominant — sort of like the gene for brown
eyes in humans — but this one isn’t. We’re still trying to
puzzle it out, but after we do that, we will have two genes
that can be changed in ways to resist that ‘Omega strain.’
Maybe this time we will be smart enough to design resistance
the nematode can’t overcome.”
Knowing they were on the
right path with the resistance genes, Lightfoot’s team
members began about four years ago trying to solve a related
problem. Why, they wondered, did yields go down when
resistance went up.
“We used every resource
imaginable for the first two years to find out why resistant
varieties can’t produce as much, pushed our techniques to
the limit, and every time, we came up with inconclusive
answers,” Lightfoot said.
Help came from a most
unexpected source: SIUC’s Department of Electrical and
Computer Engineering.
“When we told them about
our problems with the data set, they said it looked like a
problem with pattern recognition (a computational method of
categorizing meaningful patterns not readily apparent to the
human eye),” Lightfoot said.
“When they reanalyzed the
data, it turned out we’d been going at it all wrong for all
these years. To get yield into a resistant type, it’s not
good to cross a resistant with a susceptible. You want to
cross two high-yielding resistants. That’s never been
tried.”
Lightfoot estimates the
odds of success at 250,000 to one — odds about which he’s
remarkably cheerful.
“It’s a lot better than 64
million to one, which is what it would have been with the
old way,” he said. “And it’s doable. You take a couple of
hundred breeders each doing 10 crosses a year — particularly
if they can use markers to see what they’re doing — and you
could make fairly swift progress. High yield with durable
resistance is our project goal/”
Deepak
http://soybeangenome.siu.edu
Last update: July 31,2005. |